Site icon Catalyst For Business

Shift of Blame: A Common Tactic Followed by Insurance Adjusters in Personal Injury Cases

personal injury

When dealing with personal injury cases, insurance adjusters often employ various tactics to minimize payouts or deny claims altogether. One such tactic is the shift of blame, where the adjuster attempts to transfer responsibility for the accident or injury from their insured to the claimant or another party. In this article, we will explore the shift of blame tactic, its implications, and how to prove different elements to counter this strategy.

Understanding the Shift of Blame Tactic

The shift of blame tactic involves the insurance adjuster trying to convince the claimant, their attorney, or even the court that the accident or injury was not entirely their insured’s fault. This can be achieved by:

Implications of the Shift of Blame Tactic

The shift of blame tactic can have significant implications for personal injury claimants. If successful, it can:

Proving Different Elements to Counter the Shift of Blame Tactic

To counter the shift of blame tactic, it is essential to prove different elements of the case. Here are some key elements to focus on:

Strategies to Counter the Shift of Blame Tactic

To counter the shift of blame tactic, consider the following strategies:

By understanding the blame tactic and gathering evidence to prove different elements of the case, claimants can effectively counter the shift of blame and secure fair compensation for their injuries and damages. Remember to gather evidence, consult experts, develop a strong narrative, negotiate strategically, and seek legal representation if necessary to protect your rights and interests.

Exit mobile version