Running a business is a stressful venture, and financial difficulties are a common issue for the majority of owners. 66% of businesses are financially distressed, and they face challenges with excessive operating costs, insufficient income, and unexpected expenses. These issues can make it challenging to invest in expansion, hiring staff, or maintaining regular operations. Despite proper planning and hard work, some businesses fail to stay profitable. Lacking a continuous cash position or alternative funds, otherwise good firms may be sliding towards disaster and recover less well from adversity.
Jefreda Brown of Investopedia talks about some of the issues involved with liquidating:
“In investing, liquidation occurs when an investor closes their position in an asset. Liquidating an asset is usually carried out when an investor or portfolio manager needs cash to reallocate funds or rebalance a portfolio. An asset that is not performing well may also be partially or fully liquidated. An investor who needs cash for other non-investment obligations—such as paying bills, vacation expenses, buying a car, covering tuition, etc.—may opt to liquidate their assets. Financial advisors tasked with allocating assets to a portfolio usually consider, among other factors, why someone wants to invest and for how long. An investor who wants to buy a home within five years may hold a portfolio of stocks and bonds designed to be liquidated in five years. The cash proceeds would then be used to make a down payment for a home. The financial advisor would keep that five-year deadline in mind when selecting investments likely to appreciate and protect the capital for the investor.”
Liquidation in some cases is the best and only solution that can be pursued by entrepreneurs. With 45% of firms failing in the first five years, far too many have fallen to a place where assets can no longer absorb debt and continue operations no longer becomes viable. Liquidation allows business people to sell off assets, clear liabilities, and close down the operations in a planned manner rather than further increasing financial issues. While it is a difficult decision, it most likely provides them with a fresh start and prevents them from living a long time with financial suffering. For struggling companies, knowing when to shift or leave the market can be as valuable as the work that went into creating the business in the first place.
When a business can no longer meet its financial obligations, liquidation — the process of closing down a company and selling off its assets — may become necessary. However, not all liquidations are the same.
Directors facing financial trouble often have a choice between voluntary liquidation, where they take proactive steps to wind down the business, and compulsory liquidation, where creditors force the company into closure through the courts.
Also Read
Choosing the right path can protect directors from legal risks, reduce stress, and lead to better outcomes for creditors and employees alike. This article breaks down the key differences between Creditors’ Voluntary Liquidation (CVL) and compulsory liquidation.
What Is Creditors’ Voluntary Liquidation?
A Creditors’ Voluntary Liquidation is a formal process initiated by directors to close an insolvent company. Unlike compulsory liquidation, where creditors force the company into closure, a CVL allows directors to take control of the situation. They can manage the process in a way that is orderly and professional.
To proceed with a CVL, 75% of shareholders must vote in favour of the liquidation. Once this vote is secured, an insolvency practitioner is appointed to oversee the process. This professional takes control of the company’s affairs, sells off its assets, and distributes the proceeds to creditors according to legal priorities. The process ends with the company being dissolved.
While liquidation may seem like a last resort, a CVL can often be the most responsible course of action. It allows directors to fulfil their legal duties while ensuring creditors are treated fairly.
What Is Compulsory Liquidation?
Compulsory liquidation is a court-ordered process, typically initiated by creditors, when a company has failed to pay its debts. It starts with a winding-up petition, usually filed by a creditor owed more than £750. This could be a supplier, a lender or even HMRC. If the court agrees that the company is insolvent, it issues a winding-up order and is forced into liquidation.
Once this happens, control of the company is transferred to an official receiver or a court-appointed liquidator. Directors lose all authority over the business and have no say in how the liquidation proceeds.
Key Differences between CVL and Compulsory Liquidation
While both CVL and compulsory liquidation result in the closure of an insolvent company, the processes differ significantly in how they are initiated, managed and perceived. These differences can have major implications for directors, creditors and the company’s overall reputation.
Who Initiates the Process?
In a CVL, the process is initiated by the company’s directors and shareholders. They recognise that the business is insolvent and take proactive steps to wind it down. This voluntary action allows directors to manage the situation in a way that limits potential damage to their reputation.
In compulsory liquidation, creditors take the lead. When a company consistently fails to meet its payment obligations, creditors may file a winding-up petition in court. If successful, the court orders the company into liquidation, and directors lose all control over the process.
Control Over the Liquidation Process
Choosing a CVL gives directors more control over how the liquidation is managed. They can select an insolvency practitioner they trust, who will oversee the process and work with both the company and its creditors.
In compulsory liquidation, the court appoints an official receiver to manage the process. Directors have no influence over who is chosen or how the liquidation is handled.
Legal Implications for Directors
A CVL can protect directors from potential legal consequences. When a company becomes insolvent, directors have a legal duty to act in the best interests of creditors. Continuing to trade while insolvent can result in wrongful trading claims, where directors may be held personally liable for the company’s debts.
By initiating a CVL, directors show that they are taking responsible action to address the financial difficulties. This proactive approach reduces the risk of legal claims and demonstrates compliance with insolvency law.
Impact on Reputation
Choosing a CVL can help preserve a director’s professional reputation. By acting responsibly and initiating the liquidation process, directors demonstrate that they are addressing the company’s financial difficulties transparently and ethically. This approach can maintain trust with creditors, suppliers and other business partners.
In contrast, compulsory liquidation often carries a negative stigma. Being forced into liquidation by creditors can suggest that directors failed to manage the company effectively or ignored their financial obligations. This can harm relationships within the industry and make it harder to secure future business opportunities.
When Should You Consider a CVL?
If your company is struggling to meet its financial obligations, facing persistent creditor pressure or showing signs of insolvency, it may be time to consider a Creditors’ Voluntary Liquidation. Some clear signs include:
- Consistent cash flow problems and difficulty paying suppliers, employees or HMRC on time.
- Creditors issuing statutory demands or threatening legal action.
- Liabilities exceeding assets, indicating that the company is insolvent.
Acting early can protect your legal position, reduce financial risks and give you more control over the liquidation process.
Taking Proactive Steps for a Better Outcome
Liquidation is never an easy decision, but choosing a Creditors’ Voluntary Liquidation allows directors to manage the process responsibly and retain control over how the business is wound down. By acting early, directors can protect their legal standing, reduce the stress of creditor pressure and preserve their professional reputation.
If your company is facing financial challenges, seeking advice from an insolvency practitioner can help you explore your options and choose the best path forward.